From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqdomain: protect macro variable in domain iterators Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:30:11 -0600 Message-ID: <4EE0BBE3.60508@gmail.com> References: <1322833997-32083-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <1322832609-24956-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <20111202134458.GD2892@localhost.localdomain> <4EE08569.3070009@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4EE08569.3070009@atmel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, Dave Martin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/08/2011 03:37 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 12/02/2011 02:44 PM, Dave Martin : >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:30:09PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >> >> Looks OK to me: >> >> Acked-by: Dave Martin > > Rob, > > Do you want a different implementation for this. I think it is the > simplest way to write this macro... > > If it is ok for you, it will be interesting to include this patch > quickly so that I will be able to queue my own patches on top of it. > (Cc: stable can be a good idea also). > Yes, it's fine. The irqdomain patches need to be taken by tglx or acked by him. I don't think this is needed for stable. The existing users are fine and new ones aren't going to be added to stable kernels. Rob