From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: add arm soc generic cpufreq driver Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:42:29 -0800 Message-ID: <4EEF7785.8040907@codeaurora.org> References: <1324031462-24961-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <1324031462-24961-2-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <20111216105229.GB3230@totoro> <4EEBA306.3060309@codeaurora.org> <20111219010357.GW28768@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111219010357.GW28768-iWYTGMXpHj9ITqJhDdzsOjpauB2SiJktrE5yTffgRl4@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Richard Zhao Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, eric.miao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Bryan Huntsman , cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org, Richard Zhao , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/11 17:03, Richard Zhao wrote: > > Do you have to patch to implement per-cpu udelay? In current code, udelay uses > global loops_per_jiffy. > > We've been carrying forward the timer based udelay patches. They're in the patch tracker as 6873/1, 6874/1, and 6875/1. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.