From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Hook up power domains to generic power domain infrastructure Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:16:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFA43AC.8030900@gmail.com> References: <1323704789-23923-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <1323704789-23923-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <1323704789-23923-3-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <20111226190616.GL8722@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111226190616.GL8722@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Thomas Abraham , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, kgene.kim@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/26/2011 08:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:16:29PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > >> + /* Wait max 1ms */ >> + timeout = 10; >> + while ((__raw_readl(base + 0x4) & S5P_INT_LOCAL_PWR_EN) >> + != S5P_INT_LOCAL_PWR_EN) { >> + if (!timeout) { >> + pr_err("Power domain %s enable failed\n", domain->name); >> + return -ETIMEDOUT; >> + } >> + timeout--; >> + udelay(100); >> + } > > Might be worth putting a cpu_relax() in there just to be a bit nicer? There is a quite significant delay within the loop, thus it might make more sense to replace udelay() with usleep_range() instead.