From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/14] Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:13:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com> References: <1327352870-14687-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <4F1DD6DF.4080706@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F1DD6DF.4080706-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Milton Miller , linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches. I could use some >> help testing now. I still expect there will be a few bugs. The >> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server: >> >> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next > > Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work > and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches. Good point, I have two pending series that are using the irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled in arm-soc. > I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks > like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my > domain support for generic irqchip now. In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using the irqchip. I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it? Thanks, Benoit