From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/14] Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:51:08 -0600 Message-ID: <4F204F1C.70908@gmail.com> References: <1327352870-14687-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <4F1DD6DF.4080706@gmail.com> <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F200DFD.7070407-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Milton Miller , linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 01/25/2012 08:13 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches. I could use some >>> help testing now. I still expect there will be a few bugs. The >>> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server: >>> >>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next >> >> Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work >> and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches. > > Good point, I have two pending series that are using the > irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled > in arm-soc. > >> I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks >> like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my >> domain support for generic irqchip now. > > In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use > irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using > the irqchip. > > I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did > on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it? I've got it rebased on top of Grant's tree. I will send it out soon. One problem that still remains is it breaks x86 and any platform using generic irq chip, but not selecting IRQ_DOMAIN. Grant, do you plan to enable IRQ_DOMAIN for x86 in your series? MIPS may also need fixing. Rob