From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/16] pwm: tegra: Add device tree support Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:42:12 -0600 Message-ID: <4F79C8D4.2000306@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1332945238-14897-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <1332945238-14897-10-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <4F7602CD.2010808@wwwdotorg.org> <20120402083749.GA6576@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120402083749.GA6576-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Sascha Hauer , Arnd Bergmann , Matthias Kaehlcke , Kurt Van Dijck , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , Richard Purdie , Mark Brown , Mitch Bradley , Mike Frysinger , Eric Miao , Lars-Peter Clausen , Ryan Mallon , Shawn Guo , Bernhard Walle List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/02/2012 02:37 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > * Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/28/2012 08:33 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> Add auxdata to instantiate the PWFM controller from a device tree, >>> include the corresponding nodes in the dtsi files for Tegra 20 and >>> Tegra 30 and add binding documentation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding >>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c >> ... >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >>> +static struct of_device_id tegra_pwm_of_match[] = { >>> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pwm" }, >>> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-pwm" }, >> >> Could you swap those two lines, so that tegra30-pwm matches first. It >> makes no difference at present, but might in the future if the driver >> actually has to differentiate the two SoCs. > > I thought the matching order was determined by the compatible property in the > device tree, not the OF match table of the driver. At least logically, yes. However, of_match_device() appears to iterate over each match table entry, checking whether it matches any string in the compatible flag. Perhaps this could be considered a bug?