* DT support in i2c @ 2012-04-07 23:26 jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w [not found] ` <CAKON4OwBxfstLGFxqR+R9BD6bwD28OD-fCOwLSSs7v_Q=1LOyQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w @ 2012-04-07 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ Grant, moving of_i2c.c into drivers/i2c would parallel your spi/gpio patches. of_i2c_register_devices() needs to be moved up into i2c-core. Right now the ten bus drivers are individually calling it. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKON4OwBxfstLGFxqR+R9BD6bwD28OD-fCOwLSSs7v_Q=1LOyQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: DT support in i2c [not found] ` <CAKON4OwBxfstLGFxqR+R9BD6bwD28OD-fCOwLSSs7v_Q=1LOyQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-04-09 1:17 ` Rob Herring [not found] ` <4F8238A3.3010502-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2012-04-09 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ On 04/07/2012 06:26 PM, jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > Grant, moving of_i2c.c into drivers/i2c would parallel your spi/gpio patches. > > of_i2c_register_devices() needs to be moved up into i2c-core. Right > now the ten bus drivers are individually calling it. I posted patches to do just this a while back and the i2c maintainers didn't like the idea. Feel free to try again. :) Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4F8238A3.3010502-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: DT support in i2c [not found] ` <4F8238A3.3010502-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-04-09 5:26 ` jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w [not found] ` <CAKON4OwPYHP1Zhbc20CtgAvD_qNzAyXC5ndZbMhJh5aSd-W-VA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w @ 2012-04-09 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring; +Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On 04/07/2012 06:26 PM, jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: >> Grant, moving of_i2c.c into drivers/i2c would parallel your spi/gpio patches. >> >> of_i2c_register_devices() needs to be moved up into i2c-core. Right >> now the ten bus drivers are individually calling it. > > I posted patches to do just this a while back and the i2c maintainers > didn't like the idea. Feel free to try again. :) Try resubmitting the patch, but only submit this change. Looking back at the original submission Jean was concerned about other aspects of your series and it looks like he ignored this part. > > Rob > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKON4OwPYHP1Zhbc20CtgAvD_qNzAyXC5ndZbMhJh5aSd-W-VA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: DT support in i2c [not found] ` <CAKON4OwPYHP1Zhbc20CtgAvD_qNzAyXC5ndZbMhJh5aSd-W-VA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-04-09 13:34 ` Rob Herring 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2012-04-09 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ On 04/09/2012 12:26 AM, jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On 04/07/2012 06:26 PM, jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: >>> Grant, moving of_i2c.c into drivers/i2c would parallel your spi/gpio patches. >>> >>> of_i2c_register_devices() needs to be moved up into i2c-core. Right >>> now the ten bus drivers are individually calling it. >> >> I posted patches to do just this a while back and the i2c maintainers >> didn't like the idea. Feel free to try again. :) > > Try resubmitting the patch, but only submit this change. Looking back > at the original submission Jean was concerned about other aspects of > your series and it looks like he ignored this part. Really? Seems pretty clear to me: > But anyway, I don't buy the whole thing. We currently have a nice > separation between OF and the underlying bus types. Breaking it all > just for the sake of saving one call in 4 drivers (out of ~70 in the > current kernel tree) doesn't seem worth it, at all. It would make > things harder to maintain, too (I definitely do not want to maintain > OF-specific code). Maybe when i2c is the only thing left and there are dozens of OF enabled i2c drivers he'll feel differently. In the meantime, I've got more pressing things to spend time on. Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-09 13:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-04-07 23:26 DT support in i2c jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w [not found] ` <CAKON4OwBxfstLGFxqR+R9BD6bwD28OD-fCOwLSSs7v_Q=1LOyQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-04-09 1:17 ` Rob Herring [not found] ` <4F8238A3.3010502-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2012-04-09 5:26 ` jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w [not found] ` <CAKON4OwPYHP1Zhbc20CtgAvD_qNzAyXC5ndZbMhJh5aSd-W-VA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-04-09 13:34 ` Rob Herring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).