From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu: tegra/gart: use correct gart_device Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:07:57 -0600 Message-ID: <4F8C43DD.30000@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1334322489-837-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20120416115902.GX2428@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120416115902.GX2428-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Vandana Salve , Hiroshi DOYU , Olof Johansson , Colin Cross , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/16/2012 05:59 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Applied patches 1 and 2. Should I also queue up patch 3 after the > objections have been fixed? The patch doesn't touch drivers/iommu... I expect I'd take that through the Tegra tree to minimize conflicts.