From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] staging: iio: light: of: Fix vendor prefix of isl29018/isl29028 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:43:39 +0530 Message-ID: <4F964493.7060605@nvidia.com> References: <1335183097-21104-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1335183097-21104-4-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <4F958E9F.8070402@wwwdotorg.org> <20120423172829.GA2666@kroah.com> <4F9594DB.5070308@wwwdotorg.org> <20120423174912.GA3214@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120423174912.GA3214@kroah.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Stephen Warren , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "rob@landley.net" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "jic23@cam.ac.uk" , Stephen Warren , "olof@lixom.net" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 23 April 2012 11:19 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:43:55AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 04/23/2012 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:17:19AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 04/23/2012 06:11 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>>>> ISL29018/ISL29028 is from Intersil Corporation and making the >>>>> vendor prefix for this part as "isil" for OF compatibity. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan >>>> I assume this patch will go through the staging tree. Let me know if you >>>> want me to take it through the Tegra tree. >>> Please take it through the Tegra tree, it is probably easier overall >>> that way: >>> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> Sorry, looking harder, this patch touches a file that's added in the >> current staging tree, so I can't take this patch. >> >> There aren't any dependencies between this patch and the others due to >> the way I2C probing works (the OF vendor prefix ends up getting >> ignored), so I think merging it into staging should be simple. > Ok, I'll do that, Laxman, can you resend it to me? > Resend the patch. Removed the 2/4 in subject to remove dependency as it can go independently. Thanks, Laxman