From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
rob.herring@calxeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:47:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205111219.10025.arnd@arndb.de>
On 05/11/2012 02:19 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012, Grant Likely wrote:
>> How about the following instead (very rough, there should be a cleaner
>> way to update the gc pointer in of_xlate):
>>
>> gpio: gpio@40028000 {
>> compatible = "nxp,lpc3220-gpio";
>> reg = <0x40028000 0x1000>;
>> gpio-controller;
>> #gpio-cells = <3>; /* bank, pin, flags */
>> }
>>
>
> I thought about that when I suggested the current binding to Roland,
> but the problem with this is that passing the bank as a number is
> not very intuitive when the data sheet has separate number spaces
> for gpio, gpi and gpo here, so it seemed more natural to go with what
> the data sheet describes.
Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in
dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the
whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches.
Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case:
0: GPIO P0
1: GPIO P1
2: GPIO P2
3: GPIO P3
4: GPI P3
5: GPO P3
Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO.
So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-)
Thanks in advance,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 19:57 [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <1336679838-30738-1-git-send-email-stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-10 23:41 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-11 12:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-11 12:47 ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-05-11 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-11 17:32 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de \
--to=stigge@antcom.de \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kevin.wells@nxp.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=srinivas.bakki@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).