From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] ARM: davinci, cp_intc: Add irq domain support Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:50:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD8624C.8010605@denx.de> References: <1338373143-7467-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> <1338373143-7467-2-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> <4FC919C9.6070107@ti.com> <4FD77E0F.8050907@ti.com> Reply-To: hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <4FD77E0F.8050907-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Sekhar Nori Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, Wolfgang Denk , Sergei Shtylyov , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Nori, On 12.06.2012 19:36, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On 6/2/2012 1:06 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 5/30/2012 3:48 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher >>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org >>> Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org >>> Cc: Grant Likely >>> Cc: Sekhar Nori >>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk >>> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov >>> >>> --- >> >> On AM18x EVM, with this patch applied and CONFIG_KEYBOARD_GPIO_POLLED=y, >> I get warnings of type: >> >> irq 0, desc: c0372950, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0 >> >> ->handle_irq(): c00552f8, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x23c >> >> ->irq_data.chip(): c03794e8, 0xc03794e8 >> >> ->action(): (null) >> >> IRQ_NOPROBE set >> >> IRQ_NOREQUEST set >> >> >> They do not come when CONFIG_KEYBOARD_GPIO_POLLED=n. I am yet to debug >> this, but wanted to point out now in case there is anything obvious. Hups, seems I missed your EMail :-( > I debugged this a bit more and the good news for you is that spurious > IRQ messages have got nothing to do with your patch. Looks like the Good :-) > spurious interrupts on interrupt line 0 were always there - just that > they were getting silently ignored earlier. I am still debugging what is > causing these spurious interrupts. Hmm.. I did not see this on the enbw_cmc board. Maybe I can try it on the TMDXEXP1808L board, but I must admit, that I am currently lacking time, because of an accident ... bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany