From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: pcie: Add device tree support Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:03:44 -0600 Message-ID: <4FD8C7F0.5050305@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1339427118-32263-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <1339427118-32263-8-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <4FD66410.7090001@wwwdotorg.org> <20120612062124.GE4040@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <4FD763C5.3090500@wwwdotorg.org> <20120612172041.GA28010@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <4FD7A36B.9090409@wwwdotorg.org> <20120613063422.GC31001@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120613063422.GC31001@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Colin Cross , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/13/2012 12:34 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: ... > One other thing: in addition to the device tree binding, this will > all have to be represented in the platform data as well to support > the legacy board definitions currently in the tree. But instead of > adding all of these changes to the patch that converts the code to > a driver, I'm thinking it might be better to split these additions > off into one or more separate patches. Do you have any objections? So long as git bisect isn't broken for build- or run-time, that's just fine.