From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] ARM: dts: db8500: add node property "regulator-compatible" regulator node Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4FE1B31C.6030100@linaro.org> References: <1340116099-17629-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1340116099-17629-4-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <4FE0A546.1010707@linaro.org> <4FE0B79D.4090201@wwwdotorg.org> <4FE1772A.2010806@linaro.org> <4FE17E24.8050702@nvidia.com> <4FE18371.2020602@linaro.org> <4FE1877C.4090103@nvidia.com> <4FE19036.1060008@linaro.org> <20120620100631.GE3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120620100631.GE3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Laxman Dewangan , Stephen Warren , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "lrg@ti.com" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 20/06/12 11:06, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:56:22AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> Are you OK to have the first patch with adding property > > ... > >> Yes I'm fine with it. > > So is that an ack? Sure why not. Although, Linus Walleij has the final say. Acked-by: Lee Jones >> It's only the unnecessary reg and *-size properties I'm opposed to. > > My understanding is that they're required by DT policies in the same = way > that some of the other verbiage is. Well I haven't put them in the DB8500 Device Tree if they're not useful= =20 and nothing untoward has occurred. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog