From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add test for re-defining an identical label Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:38:41 -0600 Message-ID: <4FEB7D61.2020004@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1339534120-27414-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1339534120-27414-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Jon Loeliger , David Gibson Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/12/2012 02:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > When merging one device tree over the top of a previous tree, it is > possible to define a duplicate label that has the same name and points > to the same property or node. This is currently allowed by the duplicate > label checking code. However, alternative duplicate label checking > algorithms might not allow this. Add an explicit test to ensure this > capability is maintained. David, Jon, does this look like a reasonable test to add?