From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>
Cc: Jia Hongtao-B38951 <B38951@freescale.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] Avoid duplicate probe for of platform devices
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:58:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFAE373.6070905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F013E7935FF44C83EBE7784D62AD3F09354AE6@039-SN2MPN1-021.039d.mgd.msft.net>
On 07/08/2012 10:46 PM, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
>>> I don't understand, why is this just showing up now? What
>>> changed to cause this? Couldn't that be the real problem here?
>>>
>>
>> The issue is showing up because we now probe devices twice.
>> Previously, we just probe devices once. But now we changed the way
>> of pci init which makes pci controllers should be probed earlier
>> than other devices. So we have to probe pci nodes separately. Probe
>> more than once is the root cause of this issue.
>>
>> The pci patchset I mentioned please refer to:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/163742/
>
> Let me try to clarify a little bit. The of platform bus normally
> traverse the device tree to add all the devices. The change which
> caused problem is that we need to probe PCIe RC devices at a earlier
> stage of initialization. So we added these PCIe RC devices earlier
> than the normal device tree traversal process. These PCIe RC devices
> will be scanned again during the normal traversal and cause
> duplicated devices being added. Our proposal is to deal with
> duplicated devices automatically and make it possible to scan the
> device tree multiple times for devices to be added.
What is making PCI need to be probed earlier? Perhaps deferred probe
would work?
Perhaps giving of_platform_populate an exclude list of compatible
strings to skip would work.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 9:43 [PATCH V3 5/6] Avoid duplicate probe for of platform devices Jia Hongtao
2012-06-11 15:33 ` Rob Herring
2012-06-12 2:16 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
[not found] ` <4FD60FB1.7050106-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-06 2:05 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-07-06 4:26 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20120706042611.GA1841-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-06 6:07 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-07-06 16:17 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20120706161718.GA26894-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09 2:34 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
[not found] ` <412C8208B4A0464FA894C5F0C278CD5D01A1E694-TcFNo7jSaXPiTqIcKZ1S2K4g8xLGJsHaLnY5E4hWTkheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09 3:46 ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-07-09 13:58 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-07-10 2:29 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-07-09 14:58 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20120709145831.GB3961-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-11 18:01 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFAE373.6070905@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=B38951@freescale.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r58472@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).