From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: NSP: Enable SFP on bcm958625hr Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:52:42 -0700 Message-ID: <4a0e7b46-f7b6-3e9a-5f67-8160537482c8@gmail.com> References: <20180827200344.16158-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20180827200344.16158-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20180827203500.GN27483@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180827203500.GN27483@lunn.ch> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Jon Mason , "maintainer:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list , rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/27/2018 01:35 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> @@ -210,6 +228,17 @@ >> reg = <4>; >> }; >> >> + port@5 { >> + label = "sfp"; >> + phy-mode = "sgmii"; >> + reg = <5>; >> + sfp = <&sfp>; >> + fixed-link { >> + speed = <1000>; >> + full-duplex; >> + }; > > Hi Florian > > You might want to add a comment about why you are using fixed-link and > sgmii, which seems very odd. Is it even correct? Probably not, this is kind of left over from before adding the sfp phandle, but if I do remove it, and I can see the DSA slave network device fail to initialize, likely because we destroy the PHYLINK instance. AFAIR, when we talked about this with Russell, I did not see why we had to comment out the following: diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c index 962c4fd338ba..f3ae16dbf8d8 100644 --- a/net/dsa/slave.c +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_phy_setup(struct net_device *slave_dev) netdev_err(slave_dev, "failed to connect to port %d: %d\n", dp->index, ret); - phylink_destroy(dp->pl); + //phylink_destroy(dp->pl); return ret; } } maybe you know? -- Florian