Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] dt-bindings: media: wave5: add yaml devicetree bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 04/09/2023 08:25, Sebastian Fricke wrote:

>>> +  sram:
>>
>> Missing vendor prefix.
> 
> After some discussion with the the manufacturer of this CODEC chip, the SRAM
> is not fixed to the CODEC chip but instead part of the SoC, thus the
> vendor can vary. It sounds like the policy is to use the vendor prefix
> of the SoC, that was used for upstreaming. But that policy sounds a bit
> like a potential for future confusion to me, so I wanted to ask what you
> would like to see. The SoC we develop on is from TI and the CODEC chip is from
> C&M, so I could either call it: `ti,sram` or `cnm,sram`

I meant vendor prefix of this device. It does not matter what SoC is
that, however it turns out it is already a generic property, so no
vendor prefix is needed if you use the same property - phandle points to
a node which is a sram.yaml.


Best regards,
Krzysztof