From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, saravanak@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/kexec: save pa of initial_boot_params for arm64 and use it at kexec
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:30:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b9456a3-47ea-4a00-92fe-131ccd80e550@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJVEjPt9tHNr0uAGHQwGnUbZDZoe7kURp3Qx0ce1jv+vw@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/10/2024 15:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 9:06 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/2024 01:03, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
>>>> __pa() is only intended to be used for linear map addresses and using
>>>> it for initial_boot_params which is in fixmap for arm64 will give an
>>>> incorrect value. Hence stash the physical address when it is known at
>>>> boot time and use it at kexec time instead of converting the virtual
>>>> address using __pa().
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>>>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
>>>> Fixes: ac10be5cdbfa ("arm64: Use common of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt()")
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>> drivers/of/fdt.c | 6 ++++++
>>>> drivers/of/kexec.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>> include/linux/of_fdt.h | 2 ++
>>>> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>>>> index b22d28ec8028..a4d96f5e2e05 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>>>> @@ -194,6 +194,14 @@ static void __init setup_machine_fdt(phys_addr_t dt_phys)
>>>> /* Early fixups are done, map the FDT as read-only now */
>>>> fixmap_remap_fdt(dt_phys, &size, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Save dt_phys address so that it can be used later for kexec. This
>>>> + * is done as __pa() is only intended to be used for linear map addresses
>>>> + * and using it for initial_boot_params which is in fixmap will give an
>>>> + * incorrect value.
>>>> + */
>>>> + set_initial_boot_params_pa(dt_phys);
>>>
>>> No new arch->dt functions please. If we need to save off the PA, then do
>>> that when we set initial_boot_params.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>>
>> initial_boot_params is set in early_init_dt_verify, called by early_init_dt_scan.
>> This is done in setup_machine_fdt in arm64 where the PA is available,
>> but in other functions in other architectures, where the PA is not available.
>
> Doesn't __pa() work for all the other architectures? That's what your
> patch indicates.
>
Yes, __pa() works for all other architectures.
But we would need to add initial_boot_params_pa of type phys_addr_t
as an argument for early_init_dt_scan, which is called by all other archs,
and we technically cant use 0 as an invalid value.
We could convert initial_boot_params_pa to void *, and pass NULL for all
other archs. But again, I don't really think we should be changing the
early_init_dt_scan(dt_virt) call in all other archs to
early_init_dt_scan(dt_virt, NULL) just to save initial_boot_params_pa
in arm64?
>> So it makes it quite messy to set it in the same place as initial_boot_params.
>> Its only needed for arm64 and making a change in all archs probably isnt a good idea?
>>
>> Any reason to not add a new function to make arch -> of/fdt call?
>
> Yes. It is the opposite direction I have reworked the interfaces to.
> We don't want each arch calling various early DT functions at random
> times and order. That's fragile when the DT functions make assumptions
> about when they are called or what's been initialized already.
>
> Another option is to make arm64 copy the DT as some arches do.
>
> Rob
Ah maybe I didn't understand this properly, but isnt early_init_dt_scan an
arch -> of/fdt interfaces. set_initial_boot_params_pa is a similar interface
to early_init_dt_scan?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 11:38 [PATCH] of/kexec: save pa of initial_boot_params for arm64 and use it at kexec Usama Arif
2024-10-03 20:20 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-10-07 13:54 ` Usama Arif
2024-10-04 0:03 ` Rob Herring
2024-10-07 14:06 ` Usama Arif
2024-10-07 14:39 ` Rob Herring
2024-10-07 15:30 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2024-10-23 9:38 ` Usama Arif
2024-10-23 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2024-10-23 14:43 ` Usama Arif
2024-10-23 15:17 ` Rob Herring
2024-10-23 15:24 ` Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b9456a3-47ea-4a00-92fe-131ccd80e550@gmail.com \
--to=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).