From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7677A38DC1; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 16:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="DCu/0Xjk" Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 409GEqUp101353; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:52 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1704816892; bh=+s45SriCMFg4wyEvqkMYU7sO4P+s/YfoTTH1GytTXY0=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=DCu/0XjkGzbx4AhW4Q1Bb3nB8rlACZEnZAY0Bpm2ojwjiUTg/cetEuTlDffhw56Yi JHfZdc5IIQ5KXToNOXeS7i84Lh9OyN5sM8buQlmsnnC/JfTQnTg0SIHnUVI8RMvNlW o8UI9tzB5evh4h7HsKJ+3yV2TT+cZ+pbdjn9SWKs= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 409GEqtO030730 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:52 -0600 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:52 -0600 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:52 -0600 Received: from [10.249.40.136] ([10.249.40.136]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 409GEoPJ008319; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:50 -0600 Message-ID: <4cdd5c4a-f940-4635-837b-872ab776f5c4@ti.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:14:50 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Rename img,powervr to img,powervr-rogue To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Binns , Donald Robson , Matt Coster , "H . Nikolaus Schaller" , Adam Ford , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Cousson?= , Tony Lindgren , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Paul Cercueil CC: , , , , , , References: <20240108183302.255055-1-afd@ti.com> <20240108183302.255055-2-afd@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Andrew Davis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 On 1/9/24 5:28 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/01/2024 19:32, Andrew Davis wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis >> --- >> .../bindings/gpu/{img,powervr.yaml => img,powervr-rogue.yaml} | 4 ++-- >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > If you are renaming it, why not renaming to match compatible as we > usually expect? > There are (or will be) multiple compatible strings described in this file, naming the file after just one would not fully convey the content of the file. This generic style naming seems common already for bindings with multiple compatibles. Andrew > Best regards, > Krzysztof >