Re: [PATCH V10 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL clock controller

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 23/08/2023 08:20, Yu Tu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/8/23 13:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>
>> On 23/08/2023 04:24, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023/8/23 0:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>> On 22/08/2023 10:27, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>> Add the S4 PLL clock controller dt-bindings in the S4 SoC family.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@amlogic.com>
>>>>
>>>> Lovely. I sent youa  friendly reminder at v8 which turns our you
>>>> ignored. You keep ignoring, I will start ignoring as well from now on.
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof，
>>>
>>> Sorry. I did not forget the friendly reminder in v8, I consulted you for
>>> this at the time, so I re-sent V9 after adding the tag. Because it was
>>> just "meson" that was removed. But V10 is based on Neil's patch, which I
>>> think is a bit of a change. So I didn't dare add it. Instead of
>>> forgetting your reminder.
>>>
>>> So what should I do, I'll follow your advice exactly.
>>
>> I don't think there was much difference between the version, which
>> received the review, and the current patch. Otherwise your changelog
>> should say that you drop Rb tag. Rebasing of something somewhere is not
>> the reason, so please describe what are the differences in the patch?
> 
> The current patch and V9 patch difference is mainly based on Neil patch 
> I put "include/dt - bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-pll-clkc.h" this document 
> describes the clock index all exposed.

Adding one include is insignificant change, thus any Rb tags should stay.
> 
> Next, I should add Rob's tag and resend it. If you have any other 
> suggestions, please tell me and I will strictly follow your suggestions.

I cannot add someone's tag, thus on your next version you must include
it. I told this last time.

Best regards,
Krzysztof