From: Yin Li <yin.li@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com,
trilok.soni@oss.qualcomm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
Srivathsa L Rao <srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Huang Yiwei <huang.yiwei@oss.qualcomm.com>,
aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/15] arm_mpam: Fix cache ID sentinel from ~0UL to U32_MAX to match u32 return type
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 11:27:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4de6c2bd-2f9e-41d8-84df-aa1a6545ae83@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dee8a67-3da9-4780-8528-6cdc9c748b0a@arm.com>
On 9/2/2026 9:49 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/11/26 15:30, Yin Li wrote:
>> cache_of_calculate_id() returns u32, but callers stored the result in
>> unsigned long variables and compared against ~0UL. On 64-bit systems,
>> U32_MAX (0xffffffff) assigned to unsigned long becomes
>> 0x00000000ffffffff,
>> which does not equal ~0UL (0xffffffffffffffff), so invalid cache IDs are
>> silently accepted instead of being rejected.
>
> Yes, I agree about this one, long is not right, it's u32 (acpi) or even
> a plain int elsewhere (get_cpu_cacheinfo_id()).
>
>>
>> Fix by changing all cache ID and component ID variables that receive the
>> return value of cache_of_calculate_id() to u32, and replace all ~0 and
>> ~0UL sentinel comparisons with U32_MAX.
>
> ... but am not so sure about the U32_MAX change. I think ~0U is a common
> idiom in the kernel to mean "mask of all 1's", and while U32_MAX is the
> same, the _MAX part is slightly misleading here, I think.
>
> So I think this patch should focus on dropping the long and L parts, but
> keep the ~0U notation. Which means cacheinfo.c should not change, for
> instance.
>
> And also I wonder if that should be split up: one part to fix the
> existing usage in v7.3-rc1, so basically the function prototype, and the
> other part for the newly introduced DT code, which should then be squashed.
>
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the review.
On the types: agreed, and the patch already changes them from unsigned
long to u32.
On the sentinel: the patch currently uses U32_MAX, but you make a fair
point that ~0U is the more common idiom for an all-ones mask and that
_MAX reads a bit misleading here. I'll switch it back to ~0U and leave
cacheinfo.c unchanged, so the patch focuses on just the long/UL type fix.
(Drew raised the opposite on patch 02/15, but as a question rather than
a strong preference — Drew, please shout if you disagree.)
As discussed with Ben, I'll fold these type fixes back into the
respective inherited patches.
Thx and BRs,
Yin
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
>>
>> Also fix the sentinel values in cache_of_calculate_id() itself for
>> consistency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yin Li <yin.li@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> index f75e7f64038b..a4e0d1d47e71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static bool match_cache_node(struct device_node *cpu,
>> u32 cache_of_calculate_id(struct device_node *cache_node)
>> {
>> struct device_node *cpu;
>> - u32 min_id = ~0;
>> + u32 min_id = U32_MAX;
>> for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) {
>> u64 id = of_get_cpu_hwid(cpu, 0);
>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ u32 cache_of_calculate_id(struct device_node
>> *cache_node)
>> id = arch_compact_of_hwid(id);
>> if (FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(63, 32), id)) {
>> of_node_put(cpu);
>> - return ~0;
>> + return U32_MAX;
>> }
>> if (match_cache_node(cpu, cache_node))
>> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void cache_of_set_id(struct cacheinfo
>> *this_leaf,
>> {
>> u32 id = cache_of_calculate_id(cache_node);
>> - if (id != ~0) {
>> + if (id != U32_MAX) {
>> this_leaf->id = id;
>> this_leaf->attributes |= CACHE_ID;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/
>> mpam_devices.c
>> index 559fa09128b4..ddc15249ec1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -166,13 +166,13 @@ static void mpam_free_garbage(void)
>> /* Called recursively to walk the list of caches from a particular
>> CPU */
>> static void __mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(int cpu, struct
>> device_node *cache_node,
>> - unsigned long cache_id,
>> + u32 cache_id,
>> u32 cache_level,
>> cpumask_t *affinity)
>> {
>> int err;
>> u32 iter_level;
>> - unsigned long iter_cache_id;
>> + u32 iter_cache_id;
>> struct device_node *iter_node __free(device_node) =
>> of_find_next_cache_node(cache_node);
>> if (!iter_node)
>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void __mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(int
>> cpu, struct device_node *cache_
>> * during device_initcall(). Use cache_of_calculate_id().
>> */
>> iter_cache_id = cache_of_calculate_id(iter_node);
>> - if (iter_cache_id == ~0UL)
>> + if (iter_cache_id == U32_MAX)
>> return;
>> if (iter_level == cache_level && iter_cache_id == cache_id)
>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void __mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(int
>> cpu, struct device_node *cache_
>> * The cacheinfo structures are only populated when CPUs are online.
>> * This helper walks the device tree to include offline CPUs too.
>> */
>> -int mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(unsigned long cache_id, u32
>> cache_level,
>> +int mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(u32 cache_id, u32 cache_level,
>> cpumask_t *affinity)
>> {
>> int cpu;
>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int get_cpumask_from_cache(struct
>> device_node *cache,
>> {
>> int err;
>> u32 cache_level;
>> - unsigned long cache_id;
>> + u32 cache_id;
>> err = of_property_read_u32(cache, "cache-level", &cache_level);
>> if (err) {
>> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int get_cpumask_from_cache(struct
>> device_node *cache,
>> }
>> cache_id = cache_of_calculate_id(cache);
>> - if (cache_id == ~0UL) {
>> + if (cache_id == U32_MAX) {
>> pr_err("Failed to calculate cache-id from cache node\n");
>> return -ENOENT;
>> }
>> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int mpam_dt_parse_resource(struct mpam_msc
>> *msc, struct device_node *np,
>> {
>> int err = 0;
>> u32 class_id = 0;
>> - unsigned long component_id = 0;
>> + u32 component_id = 0;
>> struct device *dev = &msc->pdev->dev;
>> enum mpam_class_types type = MPAM_CLASS_UNKNOWN;
>> struct device_node *cache __free(device_node) = NULL;
>> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int mpam_dt_parse_resource(struct mpam_msc
>> *msc, struct device_node *np,
>> return err;
>> }
>> component_id = cache_of_calculate_id(cache);
>> - if (component_id == ~0) {
>> + if (component_id == U32_MAX) {
>> dev_err_once(dev, "Failed to calculate cache-id\n");
>> return -ENOENT;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/
>> mpam_internal.h
>> index def0e3a65c23..aa45d00bcd07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ int mpam_msmon_read(struct mpam_component *comp,
>> struct mon_cfg *ctx,
>> enum mpam_device_features, u64 *val);
>> void mpam_msmon_reset_mbwu(struct mpam_component *comp, struct
>> mon_cfg *ctx);
>> -int mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(unsigned long cache_id, u32
>> cache_level,
>> +int mpam_get_cpumask_from_cache_id(u32 cache_id, u32 cache_level,
>> cpumask_t *affinity);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_RESCTRL_FS
>>
>
--
Thx and BRs,
Yin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 13:30 [PATCH RFC 00/15] arm-mpam: Add basic device tree support for resctrl Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 01/15] dt-bindings: arm: Add MPAM MSC binding Yin Li
2026-09-03 10:03 ` Ben Horgan
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 02/15] cacheinfo: Expose the code to generate a cache-id from a device_node Yin Li
2026-08-25 19:11 ` Drew Fustini
2026-08-31 5:43 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 03/15] arm_mpam: Add device tree support for MSC probing Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 04/15] arm_mpam: Add support for memory controller MSC on DT platforms Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 05/15] arm_mpam: Fix device_node refcount in DT resource parsing Yin Li
2026-09-02 13:29 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-03 8:07 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 06/15] arm_mpam: Fix cache ID sentinel from ~0UL to U32_MAX to match u32 return type Yin Li
2026-09-02 13:49 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-04 3:27 ` Yin Li [this message]
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 07/15] arm_mpam: Fix the RIS index range check in mpam_ris_create_locked Yin Li
2026-09-02 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-03 8:18 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 08/15] arm_mpam: Fix ris_idx type to prevent range check bypass on truncation Yin Li
2026-09-02 16:22 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-03 9:42 ` Yin Li
2026-09-03 13:27 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-04 2:42 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 09/15] arm_mpam: Fix MSC MMIO window size to use resource_size() instead of end - start Yin Li
2026-09-02 13:16 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-03 9:45 ` Yin Li
2026-09-03 10:20 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-03 13:23 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-04 3:12 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 10/15] arm_mpam: Fix update_msc_accessibility() return type to void Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 11/15] arm_mpam: Fix mpam_dt_create_foundling_msc() to create MSC platform devices Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 12/15] arm_mpam: Fix get_cpumask_from_cache() to clear mask on error Yin Li
2026-09-02 16:03 ` Andre Przywara
2026-09-03 9:59 ` Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 13/15] dt-bindings: arm: Fix MPAM MSC binding schema and examples Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH RFC 14/15] arm_mpam: Support MSC accessibility derivation from RIS nodes Yin Li
2026-08-11 13:30 ` [PATCH DNM RFC 15/15] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add MPAM MSC nodes for the L2 caches Yin Li
2026-08-25 8:27 ` [PATCH RFC 00/15] arm-mpam: Add basic device tree support for resctrl Yin Li
2026-09-03 10:11 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-04 2:52 ` Yin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4de6c2bd-2f9e-41d8-84df-aa1a6545ae83@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=yin.li@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huang.yiwei@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=trilok.soni@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox