From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mxout3.routing.net (mxout3.routing.net [134.0.28.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1CB228CB3; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=134.0.28.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733747559; cv=none; b=fV63zZnBuuVMBdn8Vxfgiqf+IbR0w3lVbTyCZWFL+Zi7MKAN4HLzizHaAO5CXNx9lJ4VMaoqXuVXAYJtvHEzayU7vmldzpEaz1yOw6IK9Fyhi4DFE3R/GP7aEK3QA+f9GSDCKif5ZDoS9t9OFa1H7Hvyoghsvsilc23n12jrdS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733747559; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eTL/Zz4CgiLwSVDJJZSIvMZWl9IFMTtE63Ql03tuA4c=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=pts3+k7XAHj/gsf8yVwINoB6EzKowc0BCLe2btwZAKTTE7EMn6Wb+nlZKBJhn7lMGZ6qA3TbJDCpws77TjdrgoUfiFW8RNmEbSnZUdumozyKrqk+4+KYmuoSuQ2m68vYrlfAx477MajVXeBr3EWeOnBjvoUVpSYd+yguPt1T1LQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fw-web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fw-web.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mailerdienst.de header.i=@mailerdienst.de header.b=HmsVggyO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=134.0.28.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fw-web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fw-web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mailerdienst.de header.i=@mailerdienst.de header.b="HmsVggyO" Received: from mxbox1.masterlogin.de (unknown [192.168.10.88]) by mxout3.routing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C55605F0; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailerdienst.de; s=20200217; t=1733747548; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2fNQK0VC5hmdkf5xB9w2EQXUei7uJNRsiN8mjKgCeDE=; b=HmsVggyOYb4b6hCgAOoZTRkTYjnu9X2Mj1mGgv+WcHtMf7EKAtJCqImI3UsGf6tXhGFg+t yPWIWYJFPaDQFS3dBLz0v0ImNUHd9OA/hadfZ4wSk8zROQZA1WP3y0nrw8YRG4uUlSTcXy NiatFxMY57d2z2gD1NYj0tuRadkkGwo= Received: from webmail.hosting.de (unknown [134.0.26.148]) by mxbox1.masterlogin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6DEF4003A; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 13:32:27 +0100 From: "Frank Wunderlich (linux)" To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Cc: Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , Sean Wang , Frank Wunderlich , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7988: add pinctrl subnodes for bpi-r4 In-Reply-To: <9b1a385e-da1c-429b-91b9-d5b5d6d5abb7@collabora.com> References: <20241202110045.22084-1-linux@fw-web.de> <20241202110045.22084-6-linux@fw-web.de> <9b1a385e-da1c-429b-91b9-d5b5d6d5abb7@collabora.com> Message-ID: <4e0ace7c5a0766395f8801bdd2fcdbf9@fw-web.de> X-Sender: linux@fw-web.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-ID: b6b2de20-0394-48f5-9719-e7ee90c90504 Am 2024-12-09 12:52, schrieb AngeloGioacchino Del Regno: > Il 02/12/24 12:00, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto: >> From: Frank Wunderlich >> >> Add board specidic pinctrl configurations on Bananapi R4. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich > > Can you change the title as suggested in the review for the other > series? > So that we stay consistent. already done in my tree (and fixed typo in commit message) ;) 8e566779ee82 arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7988a-bpi-r4: Add pinctrl subnodes for bpi-r4 > After which, > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > thx are parts 1+2 now ok? regards Frank