From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39C9C433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBCB207BC for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:18:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590747509; bh=1gO1/eZcCypQP2/ERBE2xRPkz/uvzqJx0ATFlqsEmQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=g6xcOXGMzKPeSgl/DWbpyQcKFAEHaRr8DfuI1bRJ/D8qgjggg3Q7GutESSXLLsYMO FiNk4U3m8C7/7M5d55brnB3svrd2kKGboL1GGYA6oJqnbBAYVMP5ZULqfoBC0cK+Fs VTeUN48uLpPhOK1RHf1Z1XYcsiUljyh4o9LelPag= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725854AbgE2KS3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 06:18:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49016 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725601AbgE2KS2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 06:18:28 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7832075A; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:18:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590747508; bh=1gO1/eZcCypQP2/ERBE2xRPkz/uvzqJx0ATFlqsEmQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CmSiG5525ab+yozhZiB84XPVzV7snokbfJF9Rtldc9iVsemZb0h2E/7sxR0sbiSAQ 9HW8JvwQCF+b4epTSwe4rIDn1tkLcCaJEeWOrJcTLX7eIhRCnTxM32clXQIlFvzXJS VAAHNMY9zmUfU9+oPFoTPyUo/pQgmqfvRVhx2ahU= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jec5q-00GF29-8i; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:18:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:18:26 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Lokesh Vutla Cc: Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo , Santosh Shilimkar , Linux ARM Mailing List , Sekhar Nori , Grygorii Strashko , Peter Ujfalusi , Device Tree Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: ti,sci-intr: Update bindings to drop the usage of gic as parent In-Reply-To: References: <20200520124454.10532-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200520124454.10532-5-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200528221406.GA769073@bogus> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4 Message-ID: <4ea8c6110a16900220a65f1d44145146@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: lokeshvutla@ti.com, robh@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, nm@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nsekhar@ti.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt >>> router >>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >> >> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >> compatibility. > > Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. > But IMHO, > this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this > is not > deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking > backward > compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did > discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being reverted, right? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...