From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51604C43217 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236459AbiKWIUy (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 03:20:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56970 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236462AbiKWIUt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 03:20:49 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4073DFAEBD for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id f13so5550733lfa.6 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:20:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IhFEQELa4VkTH3dXCJFPIV5f7OVafEghYhmDz8dxAsw=; b=ti0fy3zFjpws7aumeLZs4bfmrqyyUmZEkE6AkEd6AxWduEk4ZrhiKtm/h+Mz00+5Sn qB5P8Ocx1KzMRETnzTrdSiQTQJZpH2sxphGQDOwOkPp1gJ6qYSrpGJSR6FlVbaKz/+9G Mcoq4D22FZP5gmimwaBhuHIdIBqb8DK8vXcRb7jF/7aMVzYFxLEN0HBcNJNg41b7wRas Z2GLoJ1bjuI6R6bDGvpuxzrCa1GLfvXyeR37Jbm2emzMKbucVsLle+IfrtD1+Fh52CEb HhZWkAE1deU4LoH3gLaPmorX8A4i63J+dKQLq2kBZOW0Afp2vABNv3A3NS56viGSPuln 9t0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IhFEQELa4VkTH3dXCJFPIV5f7OVafEghYhmDz8dxAsw=; b=MWzoxphicDHgLiS3CZKpIdNm7MJKc66MkPGxagplxwMEq+6/LMsp+EW+v6pEHBts5C gtT298gvSv5GCILmKde7cxmPGEvpLW2TodzEmW+OANNf/u1SE49SUn2TZ700Ljun0a/o 1oIPvZcGbniBA3tb3082OXW+TNwatAbxDSRZvJc6kfokIPKOyoYxWSeEKXeh96dbTwM6 htuuLOyCeXWij0oSiDgNKBHby/eoLOoveM03tmYBgkAIjHYQPKQIGu9rJv7/fcKayYUw gxdQnOG/1N+5UNGdNrZZjXp1jcjI5jjzJo5lpCrq9IcOmrCLfMywxtNmt9S3macAGoq7 yb5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnOyVzz60V01gwQIazgOEDx2V4t7S8pP6Rb817AdcVzGUQlLp0f DD3eRYY4nOXyNZlzAK5Sqq5+2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4CI8Ij3JSwtMSUrYc+lIf7HpUCJeQnclMNeRAu9pqSPkVrvgNxp3xG0b2MW5XqYTW6hP4Cnw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:689:b0:494:78cc:f153 with SMTP id t9-20020a056512068900b0049478ccf153mr8626000lfe.644.1669191636500; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j12-20020a05651231cc00b0048a934168c0sm2790896lfe.35.2022.11.23.00.20.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:20:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4f4bdc95-16a2-df76-9787-df46a3b5e1eb@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:20:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 06/20] arm64: dts: Update cache properties for exynos Content-Language: en-US To: Pierre Gondois , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob.Herring@arm.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20221031091945.531874-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> <166742051292.139492.12539582422109367063.b4-ty@linaro.org> <7681ba8e-1036-7540-5eda-417ed204d35f@arm.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <7681ba8e-1036-7540-5eda-417ed204d35f@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/2022 17:52, Pierre Gondois wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > This patch and [1] were dropped after a bad patch management from my part. > v1 and v2 are identical, but [2] lead to the 2 patches to be removed. > Not willing to worsen the situation, I wanted to wait a bit before getting > back to these 2 patches and let them be removed. > Would it be possible to take back these 2 patches ? > > Regards, > Pierre > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/2d8b2d85-7bc6-026a-baf9-11a47171ddc5@linaro.org/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bb36df3f-5aee-256a-4d64-eaeb9bff998e@arm.com/ > I was expecting a resend with: 1. Fixed subject. 2. Changelog. 3. Trimmed list. Best regards, Krzysztof