devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:43:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50069361.1080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
>>> it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
>> What's the difference?
>
>>> +- db8500.dtsi       // silicon
>>> \	
>>> +-- snowball.dts    // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks.  Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...

Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be 
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is 
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming 
very soon.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120710164130.f38e4d1673f925ddb13914c9@canb.auug.org.au>
     [not found] ` <20120712131231.GH2194@pengutronix.de>
     [not found]   ` <20120712131231.GH2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14 21:34     ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17       ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31         ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00           ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:55             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52                     ` Lee Jones
     [not found]                       ` <50057C1A.80606-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:20                         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18  5:33                           ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18  9:59                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:43                                   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-07-18  7:35                           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37         ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35           ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]             ` <20120716123550.GE17435-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 19:45               ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]                 ` <CACRpkdaMB-n7XYcxE8QtAm-WrGc2DR0krfTjQZCbvOL1HYep1Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 20:04                   ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50069361.1080509@linaro.org \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).