From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 05/13] media: s5p-fimc: Add device tree support for FIMC devices Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:37 +0200 Message-ID: <5016FE29.9020406@gmail.com> References: <4FBFE1EC.9060209@samsung.com> <5007143E.8040807@gmail.com> <3360710.ek62A7CVxd@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3360710.ek62A7CVxd@avalon> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, riverful.kim@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, Karol Lewandowski List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Laurent, On 07/26/2012 04:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 18 July 2012 21:53:34 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> I think we need a one combined RFC and continue discussions in one thread. > > Agreed. > >> Still, our proposals are quite different, but I believe we need something >> in between. I presume we should focus more to have common bindings for >> subdevs that are reused among different host/ISP devices, i.e. sensors and >> encoders. For simple host interfaces we can likely come up with common >> binding patterns, but more complex processing pipelines may require >> a sort of individual approach. >> >> The suspend/resume handling is still something I don't have an idea >> on how the solution for might look like.. >> Instantiating all devices from a top level driver could help, but it >> is only going to work when platforms are converted to the common clock >> framework and have their clocks instantiated from device tree. >> >> This week I'm out of office, and next one or two I have some pending >> assignments. So there might be some delay before I can dedicate some >> reasonable amount of time to carry on with that topic. >> >> I unfortunately won't be attending KS this time. > > That's bad news :-( I still think this topic should be discussed during KS, I Yeah, shit happens.. :) I guess -ENOBUDGET this time... I didn't really plan early to attend KS, I might be coming to ELCE though. However it's a rather distant event and we'll probably get most things settled by that time. > expect several developers to be interested. The media workshop might not be > the best venue though, as we might need quite a lot of time. > > Until KS let's continue the discussion by e-mail. OK, thank you for taking time to review the RFCs. -- Regards, Sylwester