From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: add support for SYS rail Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:39:49 +0530 Message-ID: <501B6B2D.90508@nvidia.com> References: <1343906193-8309-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <501AAE55.3080504@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <501AAE55.3080504@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Stephen Warren , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 02 August 2012 10:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/02/2012 05:16 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > I believe you need to following patch on top of this, or the sys-supply > property is not used: yes, it was missed. I tested with this and it worked fine. Thanks for pointing this. > > BTW, this patch touches both the regulator and MFD trees. I'm not sure > who will apply it. I think it relies on the patch to this driver Mark > recently applied in the regulator tree (for 3.7 I think) doesn't it, at > least for context? I looked Mark's regulator for-next and all changes from MFD from Samuel is available so I think it will not be issue to apply.