From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Add Gscaler device from DT Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:09:02 +0200 Message-ID: <5020164E.90007@gmail.com> References: <1342789723-3949-1-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com> <1342789723-3949-3-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com> <033301cd6fb0$7ac4af90$704e0eb0$%kim@samsung.com> <5018E656.3070803@samsung.com> <036f01cd6fc4$120a9910$361fcb30$%kim@samsung.com> <50197D66.1050108@gmail.com> <501B1003.1090003@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shaik Ameer Basha Cc: Kukjin Kim , Olof Johansson , Sylwester Nawrocki , Thomas Abraham , Shaik Ameer Basha , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sy0816.kang@samsung.com, olofj@google.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com, sachin.kamat@linaro.org, joshi@samsung.com, sungchun.kang@samsung.com, Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/06/2012 08:27 AM, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > After all this discussion, I can see two possibilities here. > 1] If Kukjin Kim is sure about G-Scaler remains unchanged, across all > the exynos5 series SoCs, > It is fine to go with the compatible string "samsung,exynos5-gsc". > 2] Otherwise in case of any doubts about G-Scaler is going to change, > It is safe to go with the compatible string specific to > current SoC i.e., "samsung,exynos5250-gsc". > > If we all can agree on this, lets Kukjin Kim decide which string to > use as he has good knowledge about upcoming exynos5 series SoCs. I don't have strong opinion on this, but my vote goes for using more specific properties. Of course the final word belongs to Mr. Kim. -- Regards, Sylwester