From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70DC21B9C5; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 22:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762727561; cv=none; b=iWGVs37F9rLS+CphTVmMFcsezxAnPRoaDZ3bPWMq4uZW3SWrsW+os3aJhPkuyJBrBGmw1JRayGOmutNOzZIek8s2X6qobY2Dur0CPyFzCMMBVUiE9Wo20FhE4xufOXQHejCbTiOS5Ay2g7uruQkLYELYWFEME9pQyq3YNZwcfvk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762727561; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fDMUm9q/yJ3JDgtU+vDyJyPVwa6DZQmOptBTe38SZrw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=os6HZj1DPpK86o2A4K8fdB8NPDB2gk9QUt4bVq0/ytfaPjCZEMEpOr1lWmXpOYntNB8uxn9I2AhGNKWFmVdsZFrX1zhaZbFkH8GpUHiZwUdbVlra3bZyldWe3CFPlXACbmkQ5lk1rCS4KZkYcgnuZ/OCgp0ny/4vyb0Nxu6yuHE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=UeTugOV+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="UeTugOV+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=byT23yRuymPPdxIdTw9swgQHBmcIsr3XjUFDrG55fV8=; b=UeTugOV+E0hXGyFevS5N0iiGGy Z04TlC1xumdZH+nmT/wlZcT6VB2EYFmR5T6N9pMYBtx76N4ewTk6uMCuHCsiWKrcR7XySmYklHaMC hHfkllprfyx2azRK9MI2rzFID9QWqakDL9f1eOVT8TS9jPoT337W+xY/HjDHO9ieBL5qCUzrPvBgf X9eLxHb7W+PcihWt40WJDr/4r2+jbqR8aUuVVwzuOvHzKgV20FBx3jq7hJiLizl94tWjQIeuJ4G5D by/ZGccOPc4ibNr6sXwPMx4McXn/3OHYx/1i/E0HK7JB9sMgWWwefHd1UP2X2WbX1RaYGCmouKCjg evGZ3JHw==; Received: from i53875a5e.versanet.de ([83.135.90.94] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vIDhv-0007Wr-0V; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:23 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Diederik de Haas , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Samuel Holland , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: hrdl , phantomas , Dragan Simic , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on rk3566-pinenote Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20251109-rk3566-pinenote-dt-fixes-upstream-v1-0-ed38d200cc04@cknow-tech.com> <20251109-rk3566-pinenote-dt-fixes-upstream-v1-1-ed38d200cc04@cknow-tech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Sonntag, 9. November 2025, 18:37:26 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Normalzeit sc= hrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need > > for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single > > 'port' node suffices. > >=20 > > This fixes the following DT validation issue: > >=20 > > Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@fe5c0000/tcpc@60/connector/ports: > > graph node has single child node 'port@0', > > #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary >=20 > This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix. That is good to know. Is the same true for other dtc warnings? Thanks Heiko