From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM/ASoC: OMAP McBSP device tree support Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:15:26 +0300 Message-ID: <5025096E.8030300@bitmer.com> References: <1344417101-5015-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20120808112132.GN16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120808112132.GN16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Ujfalusi , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/08/2012 02:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:11:30PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> The series changes McBSP related files mostly. It would be great if the whole >> series could go via audio tree (if the patches are OK and it is fine by Tony). > > I'm OK with all the patches, if Tony's happy with me applying them then > I'll put them in a separate branch so they can easily be merged into the > OMAP trees (or similarly if it's applied in an OMAP tree having a branch > I can merge if needed would be good). I suppose we could apply 1/11, 3-6/11 and 9-10 right away (2/11 perhaps should go near 11/11?) and apply 7-8/11 (sidetone patches that increase consumption) later? My ack to patches 1, 3-6 and 9-10: Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula