From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benoit Cousson Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] Add device tree data for omap5 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:19:52 +0200 Message-ID: <50322B68.8060906@ti.com> References: <1344961473-13675-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com> <503229F5.4030405@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Poddar, Sourav" Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Santosh Shilimkar List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/20/2012 02:17 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> On 08/20/2012 02:10 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote: >>>> The following patch series add i2c support for omap5. >>>> As well as enable I2C based devices like pressure and temperature >>>> through device tree. Also add onchip keypad dts data. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson >>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi >>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar >>>> >>>> Sourav Poddar (4): >>>> arm/dts: omap5-evm: Add I2C support >>>> arm/dts: omap5-evm: Add tmp102 sensor support >>>> arm/dts: omap5-evm: Add keypad data >>>> arm/dts: omap5-evm: Add bmp085 sensor support >>>> >>>> v2->v3 >>>> - Rebased on 3.6-rc1 >>>> - Add comments for tmp102 and bmp085 >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-evm.dts | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>> Any comment on this series? >> >> Didn't we mentioned updating the trivial-devices.txt in the >> documentation to list these devices? >> > I had posted a patch for updating the Documentation, though I created > a seperate > hwmon/tmp102.txt file. There is a comment to add it to trivial devices. So, > I will post a single patch doing so. Cool, I'll take it on top of this one then. Thanks, Benoit