From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benoit Cousson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap-device: Do not overwrite resources allocated by OF layer Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:42:01 +0200 Message-ID: <5040DB49.9000403@ti.com> References: <1346233691-10294-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <5040D745.5010909@ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA9EA8E@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA9EA8E@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , Paul Walmsley , "Hilman, Kevin" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/31/2012 05:36 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 20:54:53, Cousson, Benoit wrote: ... > I think you are getting confused between Vaibhav B and Vaibhav H :) > We have two Vaibhav's roaming around here ;-) Oops, sorry, this is the very first time I realized that two different Vaibhav were sending patches on very similar topic... That's why you were so good generating a lot of patches :-) You have a dual channel of patches :-) > I was not there during LPC this time, it was Vaibhav B who attended it. > I will sync up with him and try to get more info on it. Sorry again for the confusion. Thanks, Benoit