From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Vaussard Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio/twl4030: get platform data from device tree Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:17:17 +0200 Message-ID: <504DA20D.7020903@epfl.ch> References: <1346831186-29947-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <1346831186-29947-2-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <504A2FF2.7070607@ti.com> Reply-To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <504A2FF2.7070607@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Cousson Cc: Linus Walleij , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely , Vaibhav Hiremath , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Benoit, Le 07/09/2012 19:33, Benoit Cousson a =E9crit : > Hi Florian, > > I've just noticed that this patch is reporting some CHECK issues. > > d1f5052 - gpio/twl4030: get platform data from device tree > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > #66: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:412: > + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,debounce", > + &omap_twl_info->debounce); > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > #68: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:414: > + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,mmc-cd", > + (u32 *)&omap_twl_info->mmc_cd); > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > #70: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:416: > + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pullups", > + &omap_twl_info->pullups); > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > #72: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:418: > + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pulldowns", > + &omap_twl_info->pulldowns); > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > + pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns, > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > #139: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:479: > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "debounce %.03x %.01x --> %d\n", > + pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd, > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 6 checks, 118 lines checked > > > I fixed them since it was trivial, but next time you should ensure th= at the patch pass checkpatch before posting. Sorry for these errors. I however checked my patches before submitting,= =20 and had no such warnings. I redone, and remarked that these warnings=20 appear only with the "--strict" option, which is not enabled by default= =2E=20 Is this the recommended guideline? Thus why not enabling it by default= ? > > Just let me know if you have any issue with the following update. I will test, but should not have any issue with your fix. Thank you very much for fixing my patch, I send you a virtual chocolate= =20 from Switzerland! Regards, =46lorian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html