From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:36:36 -0500 Message-ID: <5059D874.6040107@gmail.com> References: <1347662517-4210-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1347662517-4210-2-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <20120919140705.GB16522@beef> <201209191424.56086.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201209191424.56086.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Matt Porter , Jon Hunter , device-tree , linux-omap , linux-arm , Nicolas Ferre , Benoit Cousson , Stephen Warren , Grant Likely , Russell King , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/19/2012 09:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 19 September 2012, Matt Porter wrote: >>> +Optional properties: >>> +- #dma-channels: Number of DMA channels supported by the controller. >>> +- #dma-requests: Number of DMA requests signals supported by the >>> + controller. >> >> Shouldn't these two optional properties drop the prefix #? By >> convention adopted from the various original OF/ePAPR/etc specs, the >> only properties I would expect to see with this prefix are the >> "*-cells" cell sizes. A quick search indicates this is the case >> throughout all the current bindings. > > I always assumed that the # prefix is used to indicate that we are counting > things instead of listing them. Lots of properties count things, but don't have a #. nr_gpios or spi chipselect counts for example. I'd say drop the #. Rob