From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A7E2DCC04 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768986775; cv=none; b=BGYgwgxAwdWQqY8vIDy4DTle21jMFpLuVpV5PL9F8cWDD1A0oDCv7Kkn9buwPD4zWvHqMqGSd8jFOMZcxzLmvtXR9bKuDVrinnhBJaZZh2JbJRIaTeq8hkhV4PdO3yUDfsAXCATaKVH5Wrf8bABt2IjCGjFbbZ3/wX7r4MxpDG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768986775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oSgEEEPwRaNv0kpzmgfWQvQDlOmNagoqJ410lK89w8w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vrm6+vVS9Zy8+mAdNJ8nU17cNIWSGbHRot5WyYjGzeh03JEI2weZ54GNv2NEHIXHY79/MuhT9eMMeXU75SfIGrl+cynkloD2S1BhGWZYIBJRx160rSA3gAAL/mlzRStRRMmFe52997kCPYidPklBn5LCEs6TVO2I7OK3cRUAB1U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=ap/OREcp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="ap/OREcp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=jsLSAvwVouFS1ZUYZEVJ53QymYVt0g0M3Kh3wgwwh/o=; b=ap/OREcpBA1KVY7huIkDAB0Tee qZPV0wgBw8KTyVv8BDXVVbIemBV06NbSS4DtC9lGP4DiAthwWuK0wvM69krQo713QPHHBvsRlb6KA 9ImBmJgyaN6YvFSMmFsYgO0qd7yPqewnl3SaEPdFKc9gEKvEaYaLaeiC5BIempnslEUVp/xpVCoUS SbL4tI3SJq5C7IPWcb9OyjMb8JsdX/cP8sozubhm/O+sGP8EpFnEXFp4Pboo5H933aGABbSc3HRrU EZKH1hcb1hbYKGlsP6cfsWpev+J9QoTmCUY2Fwt9FIYxXHZqKs/W9baLStxHgQoQgh1BjBgVkeGCD SqYvDrmw==; Received: from i53875baa.versanet.de ([83.135.91.170] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1viUGY-003c0W-Mj; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:12:43 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Luis Garcia Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olivier Benjamin , megi@xff.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix imx258 variant on pinephone pro Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:12:42 +0100 Message-ID: <50650709.fMDQidcC6G@diego> In-Reply-To: <46730110-5713-4e7a-a593-29ad69432e03@luigi311.com> References: <20260118214620.3319040-1-git@luigi311.com> <176890189889.310054.17634541522861042266.b4-ty@sntech.de> <46730110-5713-4e7a-a593-29ad69432e03@luigi311.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, Am Dienstag, 20. Januar 2026, 17:33:37 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Normalzeit sc= hrieb Luis Garcia: > Thank you very much for the speedy turn around. Ohh > interesting, here i was thinking i did the right thing with > the reply to with the V2. Ill keep that in mind for the > future but considering how far and few my contributions > upstream are i hope i dont forget by then lol. no worries. For individual patches this is mostly easy to figure out and also recent versions of b4 handled this thread fine. I think it's more a problem, once the thread goes deeper or multiple patches are involved. Heiko > On 1/20/26 02:39, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 14:46:19 -0700, Luis Garcia wrote: > >> imx258 had the driver updated a while back and it introduced > >> two variants, the imx258 and imx258-pdaf. The pinephone pro > >> is using the pdaf variant so this switches it to the correct > >> variant and eliminates the pdaf pixels from the sensor output > >> resulting in a much cleaner image. > >> > >> Luis Garcia (1): > >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix imx258 variant on pinephone pro > >> > >> [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix imx258 variant on pinephone pro > > commit: 6742b998166485558ccb0e89b5d5fd93c1aae3ca > > > > In the future, please don't send v2 patches as replies to the > > previous version and instead start a new thread. > > > > Next versions as replies, does sometimes confusing tooling. > > > > > > Best regards, >=20