From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>,
linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:13:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507A9E72.2030800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507A9AF6.4030008@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 14.10.2012 12:59, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Adding LAKML and devtree as there might be people willing to comment about
> DT representation of i2c-attached clock generators, too.
>
> On 10/12/2012 08:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 11.10.2012 18:00, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >> [...]
>>> Does any of you work rely on a working si5351 driver?
>>
>> Yes, it does actually. I can hack around it for now, but at some point,
>> a proper driver is needed. And yours looks quite feature complete, so it
>> would be easiest to finish this one :)
>
> Well, yes it is some kind of feature complete except regmap and DT. Adding
> regmap to the driver should be quite easy but with DT I am still thinking
> of the best way to represent the internal connections between OSC, PLLs, and
> CLKOUTs. In the last version of the driver I had a callback that was
> board specific to setup these connections but with DT there will be no board
> specific code anymore.
>
> Maybe one of the common clk maintainers can give a hint how this could be
> done in a clean way. The question is how to represent a i2c-attached clock
> generator config in DT where you want to setup clock parents of CLKOUTs and
> PLLs.
>
> A possible solution would be something like this:
>
> si5351a@60 {
> compatible = "silabs,si5351a";
> reg = <0x60>;
>
> si_osc: osc {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> clock-frequency = <270000000>;
> };
>
> si_plla: pll@0 {
> compatible = "silabs,si5351-pll";
> /* hook-up plla to osc input */
> clocks = <&si_osc>;
> };
>
> si_clkout0: clkout@0 {
> compatible = "silabs,si5351-clkout";
> /* hook-up clkout0 to plla */
> clocks = <&si_plla>;
> /* request target frequency */
> clock-frequency = <148500000>;
> };
> };
>
> Although this perfectly describes the clock hierarchy I still don't like
> the sub-node style. Another flat solution would be something like:
I think the sub-node style above it nicer because it allows referencing
the individual clocks outputs with a phandle. We use this chip to
generate base-frequencies for audio clocks, and so we have to switch
between two freqs for the multiples of 22.5KHz and 24KHz at runtime.
>> Do you still have access to hardware you wrote the driver for? Let me
>> know if you need any help around here.
>
> Yes, hardware is still available although I only have access to the Si5351a
> with 3 clkouts. The code should be compatible for Si5351a with 8 clkouts and
> code skeleton for 5351b (OSC and VXCO input) and 5351c (OSC and CLKIN) is
> there but untested.
The 3 clkout model is the only one I have access to as well.
> I've transferred the current driver version to my repository to work on. As soon
> as I have regmap done, I will push it online and give you a note.
That's great. Let me know if you want me to test anything.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-14 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4FAB15DB.5050702@googlemail.com>
[not found] ` <5076847A.3010705@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5076ED22.3060803@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50785EBF.3060508@gmail.com>
2012-10-14 10:59 ` [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-10-14 11:13 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-10-14 16:16 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507A9E72.2030800@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).