Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 12/08/2024 09:26, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
>>> bindings
>>>
>>> On 09/08/2024 07:47, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
>>>>> bindings
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:59, Ryan Chen a écrit :
>>>>>> Add dt bindings for AST2700 clock controller
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>   .../dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h    | 175
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>   1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
>>>>>>   create mode 100644
>>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..facf72352c3e
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
>>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Device Tree binding constants for AST2700 clock controller.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Aspeed Technology Inc.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H #define
>>>>>> +__DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/* SOC0 clk-gate */
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_MCLK (0)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECLK (1)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_2DCLK        (2)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VCLK (3)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_BCLK (4)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA0CLK      (5)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_REFCLK       (6)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTBUSB2CLK (7) #define
>>> SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV8
>>>>>> +(8)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UHCICLK      (9)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA1CLK      (10)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DDRPHYCLK    (11)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M0CLK      (12)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_HACCLK       (13)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTAUSB2CLK (14)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UART4CLK     (15)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_SLICLK       (16)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DACCLK       (17)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DP   (18)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M1CLK      (19)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT0CLK      (20)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT1CLK      (21)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VLCLK        (22)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECDSACLK     (23)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSACLK       (24)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS0CLK     (25)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UFSCLK       (26)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_EMMCCLK      (27)
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK     (28)
>>>>>> +/* reserved 29 ~ 31*/
>>>
>>> No, you cannot reserve IDs. They are always continous.
>> I think for mis-understood.
>> I will remove the comment.
>> And keep it is continuous. Thanks.
>>>
>>>>>> +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM  (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
>>>
>>> No, not a binding.
>>
> I will modify by following.
> 
> #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK  (28)
> #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM       (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1) 

Nothing changed. Still not a binding. Why do you send the same and
expect different result? Drop.

Address feedback sent to you from previous versions of the patchset.
There was never a reply.

Best regards,
Krzysztof