From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Jeff Hugo" <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
"Sidong Yang" <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai>,
"Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
"Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>,
"Nicolas Dufresne" <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>,
"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
"Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>,
"Hüseyin BIYIK" <boogiepop@gmx.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Igor Paunovic" <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] accel/rocket: restore the NPU clock boot rate before powering the cores down
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 12:14:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5089783.JsnAkG3lO3@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922080114.44662-9-royalnet026@gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2026, 10:01:11 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Igor Paunovic:
> The compute clock is generated by a PVTPLL that lives inside the NPU power
> island. Powering an island up while that clock is above the rate the
> bootloader left it at does not work: the domain never acks the power-on,
> and the first register access into it afterwards takes an asynchronous
> SError. So the rate has to be back down before the last core goes away.
>
> Nothing in the driver raises the clock today, which makes this a no-op on
> its own, but it is the guard that has to be in the tree before anything
> does, and the next patches do. The .shutdown hook is the same guard for the
> handover: once devfreq is driving the clock, a kexec would otherwise pass
> the raised rate to the next kernel, which powers the islands up before it
> looks at it. What this cannot do is rescue a rate it did not set - the rate
> read at probe is taken as the boot rate whatever it is.
>
> The rate is read at probe rather than hardcoded. Mainline pins the RK3588
> cores at 200 MHz with assigned-clock-rates, but that is a devicetree
> property, not a property of the hardware, and a SoC whose devicetree does
> not set it would be left running at a rate this driver had invented.
>
> All three cores share the clock, so only the last core to suspend may lower
> it; the others just drop the count. Lowering it is safe with the islands
> already down as long as the boot rate is one the firmware serves from GPLL,
> which on the RK3588 is the 200 MHz the devicetree pins: for that rate the
> firmware writes only CRU clock selectors, never a register inside the NPU.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM sparse checkpatch
> Signed-off-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: v1 of this patch kept a struct clk handle in struct rocket_device,
> taken from the devres of the first core to probe, and used it from the
> runtime suspend of whichever core went down last. Unbinding the cores
> freed the handle underneath it: KASAN reported a slab-use-after-free in
> clk_set_rate() during a ten-round unbind/rebind test on this board after
> v1 was posted. No handle is kept any more; the callback uses the handle of
> the core it runs for, which is bound for as long as the call lasts.
> "A reboot" is dropped from the kexec sentence and the comment: whether the
> clock selectors survive the global reset the firmware does on reboot has
> not been checked. The argument that lowering the rate is safe is now
> limited to a boot rate the firmware serves from GPLL, which on the RK3588
> is the 200 MHz the devicetree pins.
>
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c | 10 ++++++
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h | 15 +++++++++
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> index 5dd260bacbff6..c736537cf28f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> #include "rocket_core.h"
> +#include "rocket_device.h"
> #include "rocket_job.h"
>
> int rocket_core_init(struct rocket_core *core)
> @@ -36,6 +37,15 @@ int rocket_core_init(struct rocket_core *core)
> if (err)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to get clocks for core %d\n", core->index);
>
> + /*
> + * Record what the compute clock was running at before anything here
> + * touched it, on the first core to probe. Reading it rather than
> + * hardcoding a rate keeps this working on a SoC whose devicetree does
> + * not pin the clock with assigned-clock-rates.
> + */
shorter comment please
> + if (!core->rdev->npu_boot_rate)
> + core->rdev->npu_boot_rate = clk_get_rate(core->clks[2].clk);
see comment about using a constant for the array index in patch 5.
> +
> core->pc_iomem = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pc");
> if (IS_ERR(core->pc_iomem)) {
> dev_err(dev, "couldn't find PC registers %ld\n", PTR_ERR(core->pc_iomem));
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> index abb88a254e569..ba7c977cd6951 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,21 @@ struct rocket_device {
> unsigned int num_cores;
> /* Slot capacity (DT core count); slots with a NULL .dev are free. */
> unsigned int max_cores;
> +
> + /*
> + * The cores have no clock of their own: one clock feeds all of them,
> + * so any core's handle refers to the same thing. No handle is kept
> + * here: each one belongs to the devres of the core that asked for it
> + * and dies with that core's unbind, while this structure outlives any
> + * single core. Whoever needs the clock uses the handle of the core it
> + * was called for, which is bound for as long as the call lasts.
> + *
> + * npu_boot_rate is the rate the clock was left at before the driver
> + * touched it, and active_cores counts the cores that are runtime
> + * resumed right now.
> + */
shorter comment please
> + unsigned long npu_boot_rate;
> + atomic_t active_cores;
> };
>
> struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> index b9b36c578db20..8f03de1af488c 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,30 @@ static int find_core_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Put the compute clock back where the bootloader had it. The cores share
> + * this clock, so this is only correct once none of them is running any more.
> + *
> + * Lowering the rate is safe with the power islands down as long as the boot
> + * rate is one the firmware serves from GPLL, which on the RK3588 is the
> + * 200 MHz the devicetree pins: for that rate the firmware touches only the
> + * CRU clock selectors, none of the NPU's own registers.
shorter comments please.
Thanks
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 8:01 [PATCH v2 00/11] accel/rocket: DVFS for the RK3588 NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] accel/rocket: search every core slot when a core is removed Igor Paunovic
2026-11-04 9:03 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] accel/rocket: number the cores by devicetree position, not bind order Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] accel/rocket: search every core slot when looking up a scheduler Igor Paunovic
2026-11-04 9:54 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] accel/rocket: keep core slots stable across unbind and rebind Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Igor Paunovic
2026-11-04 11:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-04 11:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: allow DVFS and thermal properties Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 16:06 ` Rob Herring
2026-09-23 8:57 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 9:15 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-09-23 9:43 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add an OPP table for the NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] accel/rocket: restore the NPU clock boot rate before powering the cores down Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:55 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-11-04 11:14 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] accel/rocket: add devfreq support Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:56 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 13:14 ` Sidong Yang
2026-09-23 14:26 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] accel/rocket: register a devfreq cooling device Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add passive cooling to the NPU thermal zone Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] accel/rocket: DVFS for the RK3588 NPU Nicolas Dufresne
2026-09-23 19:54 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-24 5:37 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2026-09-24 7:36 ` Igor Paunovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5089783.JsnAkG3lO3@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=boogiepop@gmx.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas@ndufresne.ca \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox