From: Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: DT: of_platform_populate Vs of_platform_bus_probe.
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:54:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50913BC3.7090103@st.com> (raw)
Hi All,
I have few queries on of_platform_populate and of_platform_bus_probe functions.
Use-case is, I want to explicitly register platform devices from some nodes at post-core or late-init level(like child@1).
And I don't want of_platform_populate to register platform devices for that node again, so I pass "simple-bus" in match-table.
Problem is that exiting code for of_platform_populate probes it.
Looking at the function documentation, which states
of_platform_bus_probe will only create children of the root which are
selected by the @matches argument.
of_platform_populate walks the device tree and creates devices from
nodes. It differs in that it follows the modern convention of requiring
all device nodes to have a 'compatible' property, and it is suitable for
creating devices which are children of the root node.
Lets say If we call of_platform_populate(NULL, match_table, NULL, NULL)
on a device trees like the below with
struct of_device_id match_table[] = {
{ .compatible = "simple-bus", }
{}
};
parent@0{
compatible = "xxx,parent1", "simple-bus";
...
child@0 {
compatible = "xxx,child0", "simple-bus";
...
};
child@1 {
compatible = "xxx,child1";
...
};
child@2 {
compatible = "xxx,child2", "simple-bus";
...
};
};
of_platform_bus_probe would create platform-devices for parent@0,
child@0 and child@2
where as
of_platform_populate would create platform-devices for parent@0,
child@0, child@1 and child@2 nodes.
So the question is
why do we need to have @matches argument to of_platform_populate in the
first place, if it creates all the devices by walking the dt nodes?
It is bit confusing, As some platforms use of_platform_populate(NULL,
of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL) assuming that only matching
nodes will end up having platform device.
Also
some platforms use of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, match_table, NULL),
where match table is of_default_bus_match_table.
Am not 100% sure what is the right solution, but I think lot of platforms would want behavior like of_platform_bus_probe which takes lookups aswell.
If the suggestion is to use of_platform_bus_probe, Which I can't use as It does not take Auxdata(lookups).
Thanks,
srini
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-31 14:54 Srinivas KANDAGATLA [this message]
2012-10-31 15:21 ` DT: of_platform_populate Vs of_platform_bus_probe Rob Herring
2012-11-01 10:10 ` Srinivas KANDAGATLA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50913BC3.7090103@st.com \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@st.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).