From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch v3 3/4] ASoC: atmel-ssc-dai: register dai and pcm directly
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:32:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5098D930.8030403@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121106084814.GC5044@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 11/6/2012 16:48, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:57:53PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>
>> static struct platform_device at91sam9260_ssc_device = {
>> - .name = "at91rm9200_ssc",
>> + .name = "at91rm9200_ssc_dai",
>> .id = 0,
>> .dev = {
>
> No, this isn't converting things to device tree which presumably is the
> goal here and obviously just doing the rename doesn't accomplish an
> enormous amount. What I said was that you should instantiate the ASoC
> adaption when the machine driver needs to use them. You shouldn't even
> need a separate device for this.
Maybe this is not the best solution, but just abstract audio as a
separate device. The other's still keep as a ssc library.
> Please do look at other platforms with similar hardware and do something
> similar to them.
I take some reference (e.g: freescale, marvell, invidia soc, this RFC
implement is similar with them), but don't find the similar hardware
with us. Please help provide the information who's HW is similar with
us. Thanks.
BRs,
Bo Shen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 5:57 [RFC patch v3 1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add platform device id table Bo Shen
2012-11-06 5:57 ` [RFC patch v3 2/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add device tree support Bo Shen
2012-11-06 8:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-06 5:57 ` [RFC patch v3 3/4] ASoC: atmel-ssc-dai: register dai and pcm directly Bo Shen
2012-11-06 8:48 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-06 9:32 ` Bo Shen [this message]
2012-11-06 11:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-07 7:38 ` Bo Shen
2012-11-06 5:57 ` [RFC patch v3 4/4] ASoC: sam9g20-wm8731: convert dt support Bo Shen
2012-11-06 8:58 ` [RFC patch v3 1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add platform device id table Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1352181474-19597-1-git-send-email-voice.shen-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-06 14:52 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-06 15:29 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5098D930.8030403@atmel.com \
--to=voice.shen@atmel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).