From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Add documentation for tca6507 devicetree bindings. Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:14:33 -0700 Message-ID: <509AEB59.7010504@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1352321726-21284-1-git-send-email-marek.belisko@open-nandra.com> <1352321726-21284-2-git-send-email-marek.belisko@open-nandra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1352321726-21284-2-git-send-email-marek.belisko@open-nandra.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Belisko Cc: cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/07/2012 01:55 PM, Marek Belisko wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/tca6507.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/tca6507.txt > +LEDs conected to tca6507 > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : should be : "leds-tca6507". "ti,tca6507" would be more typical. > +Each led is represented as a sub-node of the leds-tca6507 device. > + > +LED sub-node properties: > +- label : label for this LED > +- reg : number of LED line (could be from 0 to 6) > +- linux,default-trigger : led default trigger You probably want to mention which binding document defines the valid values for that property; ../gpio/led.txt I think. I wonder if we need to think about representing the blinking/fading/... capabilities of the chip too? Should that be encoded into the DT, or should it be controlled at run-time via some LED subsystem?