From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>,
"thierry.reding@avionic-design.de"
<thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com>,
"AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@ti.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] ARM: OMAP: AM33xx hwmod: Add parent-child relationship for PWM subsystem
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:02:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B33043.2020700@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EC4C0FA@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Hi Vaibhav,
On 11/26/2012 06:19 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 16:36:06, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:33:44, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>> As part of PWM subsystem integration, PWM subsystem are sharing
>>> resources like clock across submodules (ECAP, EQEP & EHRPWM).
>>> To handle resource sharing & IP integration
>>> 1. Rework on parent child relation between PWMSS and
>>> ECAP, EQEP & EHRPWM child devices to support runtime PM.
>>> 2. Add support for opt_clks in EHRPWM HWMOD entry to handle additional
>>> clock gating from control module.
>>> 3. Add HWMOD entries for EQEP PWM submodule.
>>>
>>
>> Is there any review on this patch?
>> This patch depends on ECAP & EHRPWM to work in am335x.
>
> First of all, I think you should break up this patch as per the 3 points
> that you mentioned above.
>
> The usage of opt_clks for this does not look right to me. Based on your
> description this clock is necessary and not optional on AM335x and on
> Davinci platforms this clock does not exist.
>
> I think the custom activate/deactivate functions in the OMAP runtime PM
> implementation was a good fit for keeping this SoC integration detail out
> of the driver code. However, the current DT flow in omap_device.c seems to
> assign the default activate/deactivate ops. Is that approach deprecated?
The issue is that this approach is not doable anymore with DT, that's
why I had to provide a default set of functions.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-20 5:03 [PATCH v3 00/10] Support for AM33xx PWM Subsystem Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <1353387831-31538-1-git-send-email-avinashphilip-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] PWMSS: Add PWM Subsystem driver for parent<->child relationship Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: am33xx: clk: Add optional clock for EHRPWM Philip, Avinash
2012-11-23 11:03 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ARM: OMAP: AM33xx hwmod: Add parent-child relationship for PWM subsystem Philip, Avinash
2012-11-23 11:06 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-26 5:19 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-11-26 9:02 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2012-11-26 11:07 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
[not found] ` <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EC4D5C7-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-27 6:24 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Add device-tree binding support for APWM driver Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] pwm: pwm-tiecap: pinctrl support Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: Add device-tree binding support for EHRPWM driver Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: pinctrl support Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: Adding TBCLK gating support Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ARM: dts: AM33XX: Add PWMSS device tree nodes Philip, Avinash
2012-11-20 5:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ARM: dts: AM33XX: Add PWM backlight DT data to am335x-evm Philip, Avinash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B33043.2020700@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=anilkumar@ti.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=gururaja.hebbar@ti.com \
--cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).