From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Jon" <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
"Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@ti.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"jacmet@sunsite.dk" <jacmet@sunsite.dk>,
"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] OMAP GPMC DT bindings
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:23:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B77DD5.4090001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA0BB6B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On 29.11.2012 16:08, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 17:28:04, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Avinash,
>>
>> On 29.11.2012 06:24, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 22:28:55, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>> [Resending +devicetree-discuss, +Rob, +Grant]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a series of patches to support GPMC peripherals on OMAP boards.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on Linus' master +
>>>> omap-next (branch omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers-gpmc)
>>>
>>> Can you resend this series on top of linux_next?
>>
>> The only branch these patches depend on is the
>> "omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers-gpmc" branch from omap_next. Are you
>> actually seeing any merge conflicts with my series? If so, which branch
>> are you referring to exactly?
>>
>>> Some of the missing items I seen
>>> 1. Of_node not populated in omap_nand_platform_data structure.
>>
>> Hmm - gpmc_probe_nand_child() from 4/4 adds
>>
>> gpmc_nand_data->of_node = child;
>>
>> Do I miss anything?
>
> I didn't found definition for of_node member in omap_nand_platform_data
> structure. This also might be missing in liniux-next?
Ah, right. I got that entry from your patch ("mtd: nand: omap2: Support
for hardware BCH error correction"). But you're right, it should be part
of my series. Will add that when resending, but note that your ELM
series will then cause a (trivial) merge conflict.
>>> 2. Remove platform device creation from hwmod as GPMC DT is populating.
>>> Currently GPMC device creaing from DT & HWMOD.
>>
>> This is already addressed in cd00b0530 ("ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Fix kernel
>> BUG for DT boot mode") by Vaibhav Hiremath, which I got via Afzal's USB
>> branch:
>
> Purpose of VH's patch was to get beagle bone booting, but Jon sent another
> patch that made beagle bone boot and it has reached mainline by v3.7-rc2,
> hence the patch you are referring to is currently not going upstream. Still to
> have GPMC DT work, we need that patch as other wise there would be two GPMC
> devices. In earlier versions of your series, you had a similar patch, it is
> required, can you please add it to your series as otherwise with your series
> GPMC DT won't work.
Ok, fine. Will do.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 16:58 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack
2012-11-28 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack
2012-11-28 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: OMAP: gpmc-nand: drop __init annotation Daniel Mack
2012-11-28 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack
2012-11-28 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack
[not found] ` <1354121939-11246-5-git-send-email-zonque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 12:36 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-29 12:41 ` Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 14:59 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-29 15:07 ` Daniel Mack
[not found] ` <50B77A28.8080608-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 15:24 ` Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <1354121939-11246-1-git-send-email-zonque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 5:24 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Philip, Avinash
2012-11-29 11:58 ` Daniel Mack
[not found] ` <50B74DCC.5060808-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 15:08 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-11-29 15:23 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
[not found] ` <50B77DD5.4090001-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-30 5:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B77DD5.4090001@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=afzal@ti.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).