devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
	x0148406@ti.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	nsekhar@ti.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com, avinashphilip@ti.com,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:40:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BF952F.9080406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121205183315.GI21682@atomide.com>

On 05.12.2012 19:33, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121205 10:22]:
>>
>> On 12/05/2012 11:41 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> [121205 09:29]:
>>>> On 05.12.2012 18:19, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The plat/cpu.h file will disappear after the merge window, which means
>>>>> omap2+ related drivers cannot use cpu_is_omap macros.
>>>>>
>>>>> For legacy booting systems, this flag should be just passed in the
>>>>> platform_data from the platform init code. Then device tree can
>>>>> deal with it based on the compatible flag.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, thanks for explaining.
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean this patch series should be postponed until after the
>>>> merge window and then build upon that change or should we merge the
>>>> patch in question here as is and then care for the cleanups after the
>>>> window?
>>>
>>> Well to me it seems that you only have cpu_is_omap usage in
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c, which will be OK. Only the code
>>> under drivers/* needs to be fixed for that. So your patches may
>>> be OK, but..
>>
>> The real problem here is that drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c is including
>> plat/gpmc.h and calling a function in arch/arm/mach-omap/gpmc-nand.c. So
>> although Daniel's patches are not introducing any new problems for
>> single zImage, they do highlight a problem that we have with the omap2
>> nand driver that needs to be addressed for single zImage.
>>
>> So either we fix this now or after merging Daniel's changes. Either is
>> fine with me.
> 
> Ah I see. Yes it would be good to fix that issue first to avoid
> adding any new blockers for multiplatform build.

Already fixed by Afzal here:

https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ef9f3dd

... which is also in linux-next.



Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-05 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-29 16:01 [PATCH v6 0/5] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 16:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: don't create devices from initcall on DT Daniel Mack
     [not found]   ` <1354204892-22762-2-git-send-email-zonque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 18:00     ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-29 16:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 16:01 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc-nand: drop __init annotation Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 16:01 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 19:59   ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-29 20:32     ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-29 20:42       ` Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 20:59         ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-05 13:04           ` Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 17:19             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-05 17:26               ` Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 17:41                 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-05 18:19                   ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-05 18:33                     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-05 18:40                       ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-12-05 19:11                         ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-05 18:43                   ` Daniel Mack
2012-11-29 16:01 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack
     [not found]   ` <1354204892-22762-6-git-send-email-zonque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 20:28     ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-29 20:56       ` Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BF952F.9080406@gmail.com \
    --to=zonque@gmail.com \
    --cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=x0148406@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).