From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] Add common binding documentation for video interfaces Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:51:25 +0100 Message-ID: <50E1ECBD.3020605@gmail.com> References: <1355168499-5847-9-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1355606016-6509-1-git-send-email-sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com> <50D0A475.7010800@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50D0A475.7010800-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren , grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, nicolas.thery-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, hverkuil-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org, laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , g.liakhovetski-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/2012 06:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 12/15/2012 02:13 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski >> >> This patch adds a document describing common OF bindings for video >> capture, output and video processing devices. It is currently mainly >> focused on video capture devices, with data interfaces defined in >> standards like ITU-R BT.656 or MIPI CSI-2. >> It also documents a method of describing data links between devices. > > (quickly/briefly) > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren Thank you for the review. I'm just wondering if it is OK to merge this patch through the media tree, together with the remainder of this series. Or should it go through the device tree maintainer's tree ?