From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Vaussard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller and NAND memory to Overo Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:58:33 +0100 Message-ID: <510F7839.9040603@epfl.ch> References: <1359395648-2137-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <20130201221618.GB22517@atomide.com> Reply-To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130201221618.GB22517@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Benoit Cousson , Daniel Mack , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> >> So how should we handle such case? Having several dtsi depending >> on the Overo's revision would be a mess to my sense, considering >> the non-conditional include inside the expansion boards' dts. >> Or would it make sense to extend the DT binding for partitions? > > Yes makes sense to extend the binding to use the full flash memory > if the size can be probed. > Ok, I will see for a patch soon (i.e. in the coming weeks). Regards, Florian