devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:23:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51114003.9070405@epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABxcv==7KiBbkTyr7VLVw82F=9vVWRftpbyZWub_CVp3pQW0tQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Javier,

On 02/04/2013 12:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

[...]

>
> Yes, I saw on the list that Tony asked you too extend the GPMC DT
> support. Flash support is on my TODO list too but I don't know if I'm
> going to have time to work on this in the next few weeks.
>
> Since you are thinking to change the binding, there is something I
> want to discuss with you.
>
> We have two different version for each IGEP board, one that uses NAND
> memory and another that has OneNAND.
>
> With board files this is easy because the flash memory type is
> hardcoded (in hardware) using sysboot pins [3]. So we check the
> sysboot value and call board_nand_init() or board_onenand_init()
> accordingly and pass the same static struct mtd_partition
> igep_flash_partitions[] in both cases.
>
> But with DT this is a little bit trickier since you have to define
> either a nand@0 or onenand@0 child node for the gpmc device node. So,
> we will have to create lots of dts and dtsi to handle each combination
> (IGEPv2 + NAND, IGEPv2 + OneNAND, IGEP COM + NAND, etc).
>
> I wonder if we could just have a generic gpmc-flash binding and maybe
> use a "gpmc, flash_type" property or something like that to decide if
> gpmc_onenand_init() or gpmc_nand_init() has to be called.
>

This boils down to the problem where you have an "if" statement in
your board file, and I think no general solution exists.

In your suggestion, having a property will force you anyway to write
distinct DT files to account for the two versions, so it won't really
help if I understand correctly. We would need conditional
section inside device trees, at least to test for simple parameters.
Or a way to generate several DT blobs based on a single DT source file.

Another hackish solution would be to write a meta component, whose
probe section would do your test. But this is just a stripped down version
of the board file, far from being generic...

I will think on it during my holidays :)

Regards,

Florian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28 17:54 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller and NAND memory to Overo Florian Vaussard
2013-01-28 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller Florian Vaussard
2013-02-04  9:27   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-02-04 10:36     ` Florian Vaussard
     [not found]       ` <510F8F49.9020800-p8DiymsW2f8@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-04 11:57         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-02-04 17:32           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-04 18:15             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-02-05 17:23           ` Florian Vaussard [this message]
2013-02-05 19:40             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-02-16 13:09   ` Anil Kumar
2013-02-16 16:44     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-02-18 12:26       ` Cousson, Benoit
2013-02-19  1:00   ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-14 16:01   ` Benoit Cousson
2013-01-28 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add NAND memory for Overo products Florian Vaussard
2013-02-01 22:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller and NAND memory to Overo Tony Lindgren
2013-02-04  8:58   ` Florian Vaussard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51114003.9070405@epfl.ch \
    --to=florian.vaussard@epfl.ch \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=zonque@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).