From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: omap3-overo: Add pwm-leds and audio support Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:58:36 +0100 Message-ID: <51135EAC.7010406@ti.com> References: <1358963812-19947-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <5101273A.9090800@ti.com> <510F7BEB.1020408@epfl.ch> <51125AFC.10704@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51125AFC.10704@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Cousson Cc: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch, Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 02/06/2013 02:30 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> So a patch is being merged to handle triggers in the case of pwm led= s [1]. >> When done, we will be able to add back the default trigger. Do you w= ant >> to wait on it to merge this series? >=20 > What kind of dependency do we have between these two series? I mean w= hat > will happen if the DTS is merged before the pwm subsystem? >=20 > If that does not generate any regression / crash, then it is OK, if n= ot, > we should take care of the order. In this series the 'linux,default-trigger' property is not added to the pwm-leds node, so it is safe to take this series. I'm sure Florian will send the update to add this flag back for 3.10 or= for 3.9-rc (the needed patches for PWM and leds-pwm will be in 3.9). I'm also waiting for 3.9-rc1 so I can finish up some of the pending thi= ngs regarding to PWMs. --=20 P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html