From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: use list_add_tail() instead of list_add() for platform/codec/dai list Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:26:05 -0700 Message-ID: <511961ED.8010400@wwwdotorg.org> References: <87zk11487a.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87sj6t484z.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <50E71618.8090302@wwwdotorg.org> <20130104193712.GN4627@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <87y5fvyy18.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87vcazyxr1.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20130127035943.GJ4650@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <87vcag3hcj.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20130129014808.GC4748@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <87sj5k3f83.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87obg8z4u4.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <5107FF97.1070601@wwwdotorg.org> <87halz82bm.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <51097F0F.2030501@wwwdotorg.org> <87halw7sij.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <5110349D.3050308@wwwdotorg.org> <87ehgvrs1h.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87d2wfrryg.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87d2wfrryg.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Linux-ALSA , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Simon , Kuninori Morimoto List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2013 03:11 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Current ASoC is using list_add() in order to add new list to > platform/codec/dai list. > But it breaks added list's order. > This patch use list_add_tail() instead of list_add() to solve this issue. Do these lists have a defined order, such that changing the order does actually /break/ something? I'm just curious what the motivation for this patch is really; is it just cosmetic?