Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: Document Tegra194 and Tegra264 controllers

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 24/03/2026 05:24, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On Monday, March 23, 2026 4:23 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/03/2026 03:45, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>>> On Saturday, March 21, 2026 7:49 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 12:40:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The PWM controller found on Tegra264 is largely compatible with the one
>>>>> on prior generations, but it comes with some extra features, hence a new
>>>>> compatible string is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra20-pwm.yaml | 2 ++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> Where is the driver patch? Why this is not being part of driver
>>>> submission (see also submitting bindings DT in description how patches
>>>> should be sent)?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Just posted:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/20260323-t264-pwm-v1-0-4c4ff743050f@n
>>> vidia.com/T/#mfb40392e07d7ac9cedbaf853442eed822da7671e
>> so this is completely misplaced. Please read submitting patches in DT
>> dir and follow standard style of sending patches upstream. Just like
>> every other contributor. You don't get any exceptions here.
>>
> 
> You asked to see patches, so I thought I'd be helpful and clean up my work in 
> progress and respond. I'm not looking for any exceptions. Please do not make 
> such accusations.

I asked where are the patches. The non-existing cover letter of this
patchset explained nothing in this regard. After my question where are
the patches, you sent them without explanation why, so don't assume I
can read your intentions that you posted them just so I can see the
patches and you do not intend to merge them.

Best regards,
Krzysztof